Image credit: Wikipedia |
I’ve mentioned before that one of my (of the many I have) favourite
things about cinema is the fact that there is a certain level of enjoyment and
satisfaction one can get from watching a bad movie and then analysing why it’s
bad. When it’s brought up in conversation, a ripple effect starts and fantastic
discussions ensue, bringing more thoughts, opinions, and analysis to light.
We had such a discussion the other night after revisiting 1998’s Godzilla.
This American monster movie (that completely misses the notion of
metaphors) tells the story of a giant, dinosaur-esque monster, the product of
French nuclear testing, who travels to New York to nest and threatens to
overrun the city with miniature monsters. Those trying to defeat it are
the unlikely team of the US Army, the French secret service, a reporter’s
assistant trying to forge a career, and a biologist.
I’m sure, back in its day, this movie was something cool, but nowadays
it’s just become a really annoying and cringing piece of cinema with a laundry
list of personality disorders. The first being that the filmmakers really
didn’t grasp the point of Godzilla, or indeed the concept of metaphors, full
stop. Upon discussing this with friends, one person came out with the best
response to this: “the ‘90s didn’t metaphor.” A large portion of the film’s
problem is that it’s a monster movie where there is no deeper point to the
monster. Just a big animal doing animal things: not very engaging.
As more scenes play out, it really becomes apparent how much the film
takes from Jurassic Park (and one
scene from Jaws). While cinema is all
about reflecting what’s trending, there’s a difference between referencing
other popular blockbusters and straight up plagiarising them.
Image credit: Vulture |
Then we have the immaculately boring characters and a completely
ridiculous romantic story. The central romance between the reporter and the
biologist really is like a man’s fantasy that his gorgeous, blonde ex is still
totally hung up on him (even though she broke it off) and will some day come
back. Even in cinema today it’s apparent that some screenwriters cannot write
female characters, but back in the ‘90s it must have been like learning a whole
new language. The central female character in this movie is weaker than a biscuit
that’s been left out in the rain, her role being solely for the writer to live
out his own ‘romantic’ daydreams.
While Jurassic Park did it
better, a polite round of applause still needs to go to the monster design team
because Godzilla was still pretty cool, though how he could vanish completely
and then sneak up on the army so silently really requires you to suspend your
belief.
At the end of the day, this movie really
doesn’t hold up (if it ever really did).
Director: Ronald Emmerich, 1998
Cast: Matthew Broderick, Jean
Reno, Maria Pitillo, Hank Azaria, Harry Shearer, Kevin Dunn, Michael Lerner, Arabella
Field, Vicki Lewis, Doug Savant, and Malcolm Danare
No comments:
Post a Comment