When a film starts
with a scream and a man falling a couple of storeys to his death, it promises
to be an interesting ride. But sometimes this is not always the case, such as
in the case of A Shriek in the Night.
Beginning with a dramatic death scene, the film chronicles a murder mystery
that has police baffled. But two rivalling journalists (Ginger Rogers and Lyle
Talbot) aren’t so quick to close the case. When another body is found, a
resident of the same apartment building, the two competitors team up to find
the murderer and get the scoop.
Part Hitchcock thriller with cryptic clues,
part romantic comedy in the vein of His Girl Friday, A Shriek in the Night
sits as a truly vanilla film. There is nothing actually wrong with it, but it could
have been strawberry cheesecake or phish food, something much more exciting.
The story is all gothic and whodunit with all the answers being spilled out at
the last minute.
The characters of the two journalists are kind of fun, she’s
pretty and ambitious but not the most cunning and he’s a smartarse, cynical
dickhead who fancies her. I might have been more invested if their story and
relationship was developed a little more, but sadly it is all about the murder
and that doesn’t really work as a thickening agent for their ‘romance’.
At
best, this movie can be described as a paint-by-numbers thriller: going along
in a preordained sequence that will produce something entertaining, but not
spontaneous and creative or original at the end.
While there is nothing wrong
with the construction of this movie, it could have done with a little more
investment from the writers and director. The story is engaging and opens
really well, throwing us right in the deep end, but then there’s not a lot to
flesh out the conspiracy of it all throughout the rest of the film and I can’t
help but feel that if we were given more characters or information about the
other residents of the apartment building (as they’re the ones dropping like
flies), it could have been rounded out into a much more intriguing thriller
like a Hitchcock classic or Sherlock Holmes narrative. Its one-dimensional path
(for the majority of the movie) is fine to travel by, but doesn’t offer any
distractions, which is something that a movie like this needs to really deliver
an experience. Plus, with a little more investment, the identity of the
murderer could have been much more of a twist.
While the story is fine, the
characters are interesting, and the performances are all solid, A Shriek in the Night is a vanilla
thriller that suffers from a lack of investment from those whose job it is to
make the movie exciting. The straight and narrow path proves not to be the best
to take when dealing with whodunit movies.
Starring Ginger Rogers, Lyle Talbot,
Harvey Clark, Purnell Pratt, Lillian Harmer, Arthur Hoyt, Louise beaver, and
Clarence Wilson
Rating: PG
Year: 1933
No comments:
Post a Comment