Swinging from web to web and doing the right thing is all
well and good for Spider-Man, but for Peter Parker life has become one big
confusing nightmare. Unable to show the same diligence and nobleness in his
work, home, school, and social life, the power and responsibility has become
too great for Peter and when his powers start to slip it becomes apparent that
maybe it’s time to hang up the suit. However, even with Spider-Man gone, crime
and insanity still continue to stalk the streets as a nuclear fusion
scientist’s experiment goes wrong leaving him under the influence of four metal
arms with artificial intelligence.
It’s the truth universally acknowledged that
the sequel isn’t going to be as good as the first movie, and this rings true
when it comes to Spider-Man. The
first film was great, a well-balanced romp of action, romance, suspense, and
comedy, and then along came the sequel. I’m not saying this is a bad movie. Not in the slightest. It’s
just very typical that the cinematic departments all try to cram more into it
than running time can handle and as a result, everything just seems overdone
with an extra layer of cheesiness. Spider-Man
2 is a particularly large onion of a movie with a great many layers that
give it its shape.
Swinging from web to web and doing the right thing is all
well and good for Spider-Man, but for Peter Parker life has become one big
confusing nightmare. Unable to show the same diligence and nobleness in his
work, home, school, and social life, the power and responsibility has become
too great for Peter and when his powers start to slip it becomes apparent that
maybe it’s time to hang up the suit. However, even with Spider-Man gone, crime
and insanity still continue to stalk the streets as a nuclear fusion
scientist’s experiment goes wrong leaving him under the influence of four metal
arms with artificial intelligence.
What tarnishes the enjoyment of this movie
for me is the fact that everything is complicated. The web of stories that make
up the whole thing just became so intricate and, as such, there is so much that
you’re trying to focus on and retain in your head. We have the story of the new
villain, Doc Oc. The nonsensical science talk just made me lose interest right
from the off. And then we end up with this villain who isn’t even really that
much of a villain. His story started with gusto and potential and then sadly
fizzled out like a sparkler. We have Peter’s own story of internal struggles:
to be Spider-Man or not to be Spider-Man, that is the question. So that receives
an extra layer of cheesiness and angst, which works but you can get sick of it
quite quickly. Added to this we have the complicated romance between Peter and
Mary Jane as well as Harry’s vendetta against Spider-Man. You see what I’m
getting at; there is just so much stuff at work here. You’re bombarded with all
these plots that your mind just says “screw that” and works at half speed.
Added to the complex web of writing intricacies, we have the souped up action
sequences that have increased in number dramatically. I know that the theory
behind sequels is to make them better than the first by enhancing the bits of
the first movie that audiences loved the most, but with action and special
effects it does get to a point where you just go “oh come now.” So much more
gets crammed in that it loses all its power and, again, your brain naturally
numbs itself and allows you to just watch.
Starring Toby Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Alfred Molina, Rosemary
Harris, Donna Murphy, Daniel Gillies, and J. K. Simmons, Spider-Man 2 is a rollicking film, but just not as good as its
predecessor. Filled with action, romance, complications from all walks of life,
secrets, struggles, and drama, the dosage is upped and you just feel knocked
out from it. This is not to say that this movie is bad and you shouldn’t watch
it, if you’re a Spider-Man fan go for
it. I’m just saying that, as the first is possibly my favourite superhero
movie, this one dragged the brilliance down a bit and it became just another
superhero, action-packed romp.
No comments:
Post a Comment