After WW1, a group representing the Allies is sent to
Cambodia to stop the efforts of Count Mazovia to create an outbreak of further
war through creation of a zombie army by means of ancient mystical practices.
Amongst those in the group who travel through the jungle of Angkor despite many
perils is Armand who has his own agenda and desire for obtaining the coveted
ancient voodoo magic.
So it seems that the zombie subgenre really didn’t get
perfected until zombies were made into these flesh-eating threats that lumbered
towards their victims at the speed of mud. Whilst this movie honours the
traditional idea of what a zombie is: a mindless mass of human-shaped flesh,
its fails to deliver a fright factor. The story is pretty lame and
simultaneously a little confusing, the performances are wooden, and all in all
it’s just not a very good film.
After WW1, a group representing the Allies is
sent to Cambodia to stop the efforts of Count Mazovia to create an outbreak of
further war through creation of a zombie army by means of ancient mystical
practices. Amongst those in the group who travel through the jungle of Angkor
despite many perils is Armand who has his own agenda and desire for obtaining
the coveted ancient voodoo magic.
To be fair, the quality, in particular the
sound quality of this movie wasn’t very good and this could be a fair
contributing factor to the lack of any entertainment that I found within it. I
seriously had to have my TV on maximum volume and still couldn’t work out what
people were saying. For a start, the screenplay is pretty predictable: raw and
amateurish. It just felt really boring and generic: all the exposition was in
the right place, there were bits of clichéd poeticism, philosophy, and
declarations of love, there were solid attempts at tension creation that felt
flatter than the film that forms on cooling soup, and the only bit of special
effects that came into the mix were over-screen images of eyes, which
incidentally were Karloff’s eyes as used in White Zombie. I suppose it can be argued that there is some clever cinematic
allusion or inside joke in there, but whatever it tried to achieve, it failed
to get a grasp on.
The performances are all pretty terrible, wooden and
unfeeling with no chemistry between characters happening at all! And when drama
does finally happen and people’s faces change or they even go for broke and
tackle a gesture like the hand to the mouth in shock, it all becomes overdone
and is very much reminiscent of the over-exaggerated actions in silent films
such as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis.
Starring Dorothy Stone, Dean Jagger, Roy D’Arcy, Robert Noland, George
Cleveland, E. Alyn Warren, Carl Stockdale, William Crowell, Teru Shimada, and Adolph
Milar, Revolt of the Zombies is a
pretty boring and generic flick filled with not much substance at all aside
from the odd bit of ‘drama’, tension, or romance. Yeah, it’s pretty terrible
and if you go your entire life without seeing it, you’re not missing out on
anything!
No comments:
Post a Comment